Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Be Honest with Muslims

In response to my recent blog about the dangers of the Insider Movement as a strategy for reaching Muslims with the good news of Jesus, I received the following email from a dear friend:

Hi Daniel,

In a recent update from you, there was mentioned "Insiders Movement" and were interested to learn more.  It so happens a couple in our study group is involved with that group.  We have been introduced to it.  It is an approach to Muslims in bringing them to know Christ, but not calling themselves Christian, but "Followers of Jesus".

Christianity has a bad rap from the Crusades and America as a Christian nation.  Islam advocates that their people  read the New Testament and learn about Jesus.

I have read the book "Pilgrims of Christ on the Muslim Road" by Paul Gordon Chandler.
  It is a true story of a man born in Syria-a Muslim country.  This man thru great struggle became a believer and follower of Christ.  He is well known in the Middle East and has been imprisoned and could become a martyr.

If you would like to read the book, we will have a copy sent to you.   I think VOM would welcome this concept if they haven't heard about it already.

{A Brother in Christ}
 Here is my reply to him.

Thank you very much for your kind and generous note.  I apologize for the length of time that it has taken me to respond.  You have such a gentle way of approaching this topic.  

Immense quantities of words have been expended by both sides in discussing the pros and cons of the Insider Movement.  And I don’t want to put you to the trouble of trying to read them all.  Certainly, the Insider Movement is not all bad.  And there are many variations of the Insider Movement; some are more problematic than others.  If it were only a matter of people calling themselves “Followers of Jesus” rather than “Christians” I probably would not worry about it.  (But even the term Followers of Jesus has problems in a Muslim context, because all Muslims believe they already follow Jesus, as well as all the other prophets of the Old Testament.  So the term “Followers of Jesus” becomes somewhat meaningless to them.)  

Although the Quran does contain some teachings that agree with and even validate the message of the Bible, Islam itself is antithetical to Biblical Christianity.  (See, for example, http://www.gotquestions.org/Islam.html)  It is something like the difference between Mormonism and Christianity.  They use a lot of the same vocabulary.  Perhaps you have had the frustration of trying to tell a Mormon missionary “I believe that we are saved by faith in Jesus alone” only to have them say, “We believe that too.”  The Mormons use many of our Christian hymns in their own church services, and just tweak a few words here and there.  Yet, for me to go to a Mormon friend and say, “You know, we believe basically the same things.  Joseph Smith told people to read the Bible.  You can continue to call yourself a Mormon, keep reading the Book of Mormon (after all, the Book of Mormon contains many direct quotes from the Bible!), believe that Joseph Smith is a prophet of God and remain a member of your local LDS church, but you need to accept the fact that Jesus’ death (not your own religious efforts) paid for your sins.”  At best this would be contradictory and syncretistic.  But this is essentially what the Insider Movement often does.  Some proponents of the Insider Movement do (yes, this really happens!) tell Muslims that they can continue to call themselves Muslims, find truth in the Quran, believe that Muhammad was a prophet, and worship in their mosque.  

The book you read by Mr. Chandler unfortunately only presents you with one side of the evidence.  I have found a pretty good review of the book, explaining some of its problems.  You can read it at http://answering-islam.org/Reviews/chandler_mallouhi.html (Unfortunately the review itself is a bit on the caustic side.  I wish it had been of a more balanced tone.  But I agree with the information the reviewer is trying to convey.)

Rather than trying to tell Muslims that we want to make them “completed” Muslims or that they can simultaneously be “Followers of Jesus” and Muslims, I think it’s better to be clear and up front: we are calling them to an entirely different basis for redemption: the blood of the God-man Jesus.  In the end, although they may reject our Jesus, I think they will appreciate our honesty.

Once again, thank you for your email.  And I hope this helps to clarify what some of the potential issues with the Insider Movement are.  If you have more questions or comments I would love to hear them.

Blessings to both of you, in Jesus!

Daniel

Thursday, March 10, 2011

The Downside of the Insider Movement

Recently I learned from several sources about the “Insider Movement”.  For several decades, US missions strategies for reaching Muslims with the gospel have been drifting towards telling Muslims they can continue attending regular mosque services, calling themselves Muslims, and participating in the normal Muslim rituals—while also being a follower of Jesus.  While this may strike you as being absurd, there are actually very powerful and seductive arguments in favor of the “Insider Movement”, and it is more popular among Western missionaries than you would think.  Here is a link to one of the more extreme (but still surprisingly smooth) pro-Insider arguments I’ve read: http://blog.sojo.net/2010/08/10/can-muslims-follow-the-biblical-christ-and-still-be-muslim/

Thankfully, a few people are now speaking up with a carefully articulated response to the errors of the Insider Movement approach.  Here are links to a couple of these:

http://biblicalmissiology.org/2010/05/03/position-paper-on-the-insider-movement/ (more in depth -- read the comments at the bottom too—they are in reverse order)

Friday, March 4, 2011

Treasuring the Trinity

I was blessed a few weeks ago to teach a two week lesson to the adult Bible class at church about the Trinity.  You can listen to recordings of it on the church web site.  The notes from which I spoke are below.

 Week One:

I.      Pray!

II.   Feel free to interrupt!

III.Is the Trinity really THAT important?

A.   Youcef Nadarkhani – 10-12-09

1.     Would he die for Jesus, and yet go to hell simply for a wrong belief about the Trinity?

B.   Brian’s family

1.     Should they have been excluded from the Christian homeschooling group?

C.   A very popular book…

1.     “When we three spoke ourself into human existence as the Son of God, we became fully human. We also chose to embrace all the limitations that this entailed. Even though we have always been present in this created universe, we now became flesh and blood.”

2.     [W]e have no concept of final authority among us, only unity. We are in a circle of relationship, not a chain of command ... What you're seeing here is relationship without any overlay of power. We don't need power over the other because we are always looking out for the best. Hierarchy would make no sense among us.

D.   James White – PCD

1.     Likewise, I don’t believe it is proper to be led in worship by someone who worships a different God than I do and who specifically denies the truth of the Triune existence of God.”

E.   Why should something so hard to define (much less understand) be a dividing line?

F.    Does belief in the Trinity actually make any difference in our…

1.     worship?

2.     daily conduct?

3.     evangelism?

4.     response to suffering?

G.  Won’t exhaustively ‘prove’ Trinity is Biblical

H.   Will prove it is important

IV.           Can you define the Trinity?



Disagree
Heresy
1
One indivisible being who is God (what)
LDS
Polytheism
(more than 1 god)
2
Three persons (who’s)
Islam, OP
Modalism (1 person, 3 manifestations, roles, masks)
3
Co-equal and co-eternal (ontological)
LDS, Islam, JW, OP
Arianism (Jesus < God)
4
Distinct roles and hierarchy (economic/functional)
Shack
(Modalism)

A.   Why doesn’t the Trinity violate the law of non-contradiction? Same time, but not same sense—for both superiority and number.

V.  Old Testament references

A.   Did people in the OT know about the Trinity?

1.     The Old Testament may be likened to a chamber richly furnished but dimly lighted; the introduction of light brings into it nothing which was not in it before; but it brings out into clearer view much of what is in it but was only dimly or even not at all perceived before. The mystery of the Trinity is not revealed in the Old Testament; but the mystery of the Trinity underlies the Old Testament revelation, and here and there almost comes into view. Thus the Old Testament revelation of God is not corrected by the fuller revelation which follows it, but only perfected, extended and enlarged.  --  BB Warfield

B.   Isaiah 45:5-6

1.     Which of the above does this support? (#1)

2.     If # 1 were not true, how would these verses have been written?

3.     What practical impact would polytheism have on our lives?

a)    Insecurity

b)    Desire to become a god  

C.   Genesis 1:26

1.     Which of the above does it support? (#2)

2.     Could God be using the ‘royal plural’?

3.     Could God be speaking to the angels?

4.     If #2 were not true, how would this verse have been written?

5.     What practical impact would this unitarianism have on our lives?

a)    Why plural used only here in creation?

b)    We would become non-relational.  Every time someone marries, makes a friend, hugs a child, or attends church, he is demonstrating the fact that we are made in the likeness of God. – GotQuestions

D.   Psalm 45:6-7

1.     Which of the above does this support? (# 2 (God), 3? (forever), 4 (anointed) )

2.     What do we learn from this verse about the Father’s relationship to the Son?

a)    F is functionally superior to S

b)    F honors S’s righteousness

c)     S gladly receives F’s anointing

3.     What would happen to the meaning of these verses if there were only 1 person in the Trinity?

a)    No submission

b)    No joy

4.     Study also Psalms 2 and 110

VI.           New Testament

A.   Why more talk of Trinity in NT than OT?

1.     “As long as we look at God on the outside, we shall never see beyond his unity; for, as the Cappadocian Fathers and Augustine realized, the external works of the Trinity are undivided…. This means that an outside observer will never detect the inner reality of God, and will never enter the communion with him which is promised to us in Christ.  Jews may recognize God’s existence and know his law, but without Christ they cannot penetrate the mystery of that divine fellowship which Christians call the Holy Trinity.”  (Bray, 119)

B.   But why is Trinity never outright “taught”?

1.     We cannot speak of the doctrine of the Trinity, therefore, if we study exactness of speech, as revealed in the New Testament, any more than we can speak of it as revealed in the Old Testament. The Old Testament was written before its revelation; the New Testament after it. The revelation itself was made not in word but in deed. It was made in the incarnation of God the Son, and the outpouring of God the Holy Spirit. The relation of the two Testaments to this revelation is in the one case that of preparation for it, and in the other that of product of it. The revelation itself is embodied just in Christ and the Holy Spirit. This is as much as to say that the revelation of the Trinity was incidental to, and the inevitable effect of, the accomplishment of redemption. It was in the coming of the Son of God in the likeness of sinful flesh to offer Himself a sacrifice for sin; and in the coming of the Holy Spirit to convict the world of sin, of righteousness and of judgment, that the Trinity of Persons in the Unity of the Godhead was once for all revealed to men. Those who knew God the Father, who loved them and gave His own Son to die for them; and the Lord Jesus Christ, who loved them and delivered Himself up an offering and sacrifice for them; and the Spirit of Grace, who loved them and dwelt within them a power not themselves, making for righteousness, knew the Triune God and could not think or speak of God otherwise than as triune… We may understand also, however, from the same central fact, why it is that the doctrine of the Trinity lies in the New Testament rather in the form of allusions than in express teaching, why it is rather everywhere presupposed, coming only here and there into incidental expression, than formally inculcated. It is because the revelation, having been made in the actual occurrences of redemption, was already the common property of all Christian hearts. In speaking and writing to one another, Christians, therefore, rather spoke out of their common Trinitarian consciousness, and reminded one another of their common fund of belief, than instructed one another in what was already the common property of all.  – BB Warfield

C.   Baptism of Jesus – Mt. 3:16,17; Mk 1:10-11; John 1:32-34

1.     Which of the above does this support? (2, 4)

2.     What do we learn from this verse about the Father’s relationship to the Son?

a)    Functionally superior

b)    Honors Son

c)     Wants others to honor Him

3.     What do we learn about the relationship of the Spirit to the Father and Son?

a)    Sent by the Father

b)    Validates the Son

c)     Son baptizes others in Spirit   

Week Two:


I.      Pray

II.   Welcome interruptions

III.Review

A.   4 Aspects of Trinity

B.   OT/NT – new covenant embodied in Jesus and Holy Spirit

IV.           Any insights / spottings of the Trinity in your reading this week?

A.   Jude 20-21

Why is the Trinity important to apologetics? Well, what happens when unitarianism (the view that God is merely one) is substituted for Trinitarianism? One result is that the God so defined tends to lose definition and the marks of personality. In the early centuries of the Christian era, the Gnostics, the Arians, and the Neoplatonists worshipped a non-Trinitarian God. That God was a pure oneness, with no plurality of any kind. But one what? A unity of what?…
Anti-Trinitarianism always has that effect. It leads to a “wholly other” God, rather than a God who is transcendent in the biblical sense. Paradoxically, at the same time, it leads to a God who is relative to the world, rather than the sovereign Lord of Scripture. It leads to a blank “One” rather than the absolute personality of the Bible. It makes the Creator-creature distinction a difference in degree rather than a difference of being.
John Frame, Apologetics to the Glory of God (P&R, 1994), 47-48.

V.  A few more NT passages:

A.   Heb 1:10-12 (Psalm 102:23-27)

1.     Which of the 4 does this passage support? (#3)

B.   The uniqueness of John (esp. 14-17)

C.   John 16:5-15

1.     Which of the 4 does this passage support? (#2, #3, #4)

2.     If # 2 were not true, how would this passage read?  (I’m coming back as a spirit)

3.     If # 4 were not true, how would this passage read? (“I think the HS is planning to come.”) 

VI.           Trinity and the Atonement

A.   Gethsemane – Matt 26:39,42,53

1.     Which of the 4 points does this support? (#2, #3, #4)

2.     If # 2 were not true, how would these verses read? (Jesus talking to himself)

3.     If # 3 were not true, how would they read? (“OK, if You insist…”)

4.     If # 4 were not true, how would they read? (“Why talk to Dad at all about this?”)

B.   My God, My God – Mt 27:46

1.     Which of the four does v.46 support? (#2)

2.     If # 2 were not true, how would this verse have been written?

3.     Was Jesus really forsaken?

4.     Who killed Jesus?

5.     What is the essence of hell?

This interpretation is depicted in The Shack (95,96) where “Papa” is seen has having the scars of the crucifixion on “her” wrists. “Papa” speaks of the cross and says, “We were there together.” In other words, the Father suffered with Jesus, in Jesus, on the cross. This is an ancient heresy called “Patripassianism” from the Latin meaning “the Father suffers.” … If the Father suffers in or with Jesus, then a distorted picture of God’s wrath emerges. The essence of Jesus’ suffering was His judicial separation from God, His tasting of death, His experience of hell. Separation from His Father under wrath is what the Son suffered so that we would not be cast away from the presence of the Lord into eternal separation from Him under His wrath in hell. Such a distorted view of God’s wrath born for us by Jesus on the cross is the result of Young’s deficient view of the Fall, as mentioned earlier. By not giving due emphasis to God’s righteousness and justice as our Law Giver and Judge, Young empties the curse that Jesus bore on the tree of its judicial essence. Jesus bore God’s wrath, which entailed (how can we conceive of it?) His separation from His Father, a cup which Jesus drank, a suffering which Jesus bore and by that atoning work, is the basis upon which God now reconciles us to Himself.  – Alan Dunn   

6.     R.C. Sproul – only a sinless one could rightly ask ‘why have You forsaken Me?’ –the rest of us should only say, ‘why haven’t You forsaken me?”!

C.   Into Your Hands… Luke 23:46

1.     Which of the four does v.46 support? (#2, #4)

2.     If # 2 were not true, how would this verse read? (“I’m gonna resurrect myself”)

3.     If # 4 were not true, how would this verse read? (“See you soon buddy!”)  

D.   John 3:16 and Romans 8:32

1.     Which of the 4 do these support? (#2, #3, #4)

2.     If # 2 were not true, what would they say? (God gave Himself)

3.     If # 3 were not true, what would they say? (God gave a really good created being)

4.     If #4 were not true, what would they say? (God gave His brother)

5.     How do each of these deny the depth of God’s gift? (Son-giving—the ultimate act of love)

VII.        Trinity and practice

A.   Relationships

1.     The Shack. “Young goes so far as to suggest that submission is inherently evil—that it is possible only where there is sin. "You humans are so lost and damaged that to you it is almost incomprehensible that relationship could exist apart from hierarchy. So you think that God must relate inside a hierarchy like you do. But we do not” (124). Scripture says otherwise and it says so clearly. “But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God” (1 Corinthians 11:3)… When we properly understand the hierarchy within the Godhead we understand that hierarchy and submission are not products of sin but are present even within the most perfect relationship. This teaches us that we may and must submit in our human relationships and that we can do so without sin. The trinitarian relationship is a model to us of how we honor God by submitting to Him and to the authorities He has seen fit to place over us.  -- Tim Challies

B.   Worship

1.     Prayers

a)    Should we only pray to God generically?

b)    Can we pray to Son, H.S.?

(1)  Prayer to Jesus – Acts 7:59; 1 Cor. 1:2, John 14:14
(2)  Holy Spirit – Acts 13:2; Acts 5:3
(3)  Why is Father emphasized? 

2.     Music

Professor Lester Ruth of Asbury Seminary recently completed a fascinating study into the usage of Trinitarian worship songs in the U.S. church between the years of 1989 and 2004. He identifies the seventy-two most used worship songs over that period, as documented by CCLI, and studies their content, particularly with a view to assessing their Trinitarian content. Professor Ruth discovered that none of these seventy-two songs explicitly refers to the Trinity or the triune nature of God, per se. And, even more to the point, only three of the songs explicitly refer to, or name, all three Persons of the Trinity. In particular, very few of them specifically name God the Father or the Holy Spirit. These shocking findings should be a wake-up call to songwriters and service planners everywhere. – Matt Redman

a)    Doxology – lists all 3

b)    Holy, Holy, Holy “God in 3 Persons, Blessed Trinity”

c)     All Creatures of Our God and King… “Praise, praise the Father, Praise the Son, And praise the Spirit, Three in One!”

d)    Praise Ye the Triune God

Praise ye the Father for His lovingkindness;
Tenderly cares He for His erring children;
Praise Him, ye angels, praise Him in the heavens,
Praise ye Jehovah!
Praise ye the Savior—great is His compassion;
Graciously cares He for His chosen people;
Young men and maidens, older folks and children,
Praise ye the Savior!
Praise ye the Spirit, Comforter of Israel,
Sent of the Father and the Son to bless us;
Praise ye the Father, Son and Holy Spirit,
Praise ye the Triune God!

e)     Come Thou Almighty King

1.      Come, thou almighty King,
        help us thy name to sing,
        help us to praise!
        Father all glorious,
        o'er all victorious,
        come and reign over us, Ancient of Days!
 
2.      Come, thou incarnate Word,
        gird on thy mighty sword,
        our prayer attend!
        Come, and thy people bless,
        and give thy word success,
        Spirit of holiness, on us descend!
 
3.      Come, holy Comforter,
        thy sacred witness bear
        in this glad hour.
        Thou who almighty art,
        now rule in every heart,
        and ne'er from us depart, Spirit of power!
 
4.      To thee, great One in Three,
        eternal praises be,
        hence, evermore.
        Thy sovereign majesty
        may we in glory see,
        and to eternity love and adore!

f)      Eternal Father Strong to Save

Eternal Father, strong to save,
Whose arm doth bind the restless wave,
Who bidd'st the mighty ocean deep
Its own appointed limits keep:
O hear us when we cry to thee
For those in peril on the sea.

O Saviour, whose almighty word
The winds and waves submissive heard,
Who walkedst on the foaming deep
And calm amid its rage didst sleep:
O hear us when we cry to thee
For those in peril on the sea.

O Sacred Spirit, who didst brood
Upon the chaos dark and rude,
Who badd'st its angry tumult cease,
And gavest light and life and peace:
O hear us when we cry to thee
For those in peril on the sea.

O Trinity of love and pow'r,
Our brethren shield in danger's hour;
From rock and tempest, fire and foe,
Protect them wheresoe'er they go;
And ever let there rise to thee
Glad hymns of praise from land and sea.


With no naming of the Trinity and no remembrance of the Trinity’s activity, another thing happens in these songs:  the songs do not contemplate worship as participation in the dynamics between Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.[7]  The songs tend to objectify God as the recipient of our worship activity.  If God seems passive in these songs, we are not.  Humans usually get the good verbs in the songs.  This approach contrasts with the classic Christian understanding that worship is first of all Jesus Christ’s activity toward God the Father in the power of the Holy Spirit and that we are graciously invited into a share of his worship.  It is Jesus’ life, death, resurrection, and ongoing heavenly ministry that ultimately is worship that is true and in the Spirit.  The New Testament tends to take technical Old Testament worship words and apply them to Christ as he brings glory to the Father.  He is the new temple, priest, sacrifice, Passover, and Passover lamb.  Christ fulfills the scriptures in worship.  These songs do something different:  they tend to objectify Christ, turning adoration of him into its own end.  Instead of Jesus as the mediator to worship God the Father, is music becoming a substitute mediator between us and the new object of worship, Christ Jesus?
Ironically, by making worship of Christ its singular end, I suggest the songs distance us from the truest intimacy with the divine, namely, being in Christ, filled with the Holy Spirit, sharing in his death that brings glory to God the Father.  As Matt Redman describes a proper Trinitarian approach to worship,

We praise Jesus the Son with everything within us—but we also join with Jesus in worship as He glorifies His Father.  As the Holy Spirit reveals the Lordship of Jesus to the depths of our heart, He also takes us into the Son’s relationship with the Father….Worship is to Jesus, yes—absolutely.  We glorify the Son and magnify His name.  But worship is also in Jesus and through Jesus and with Jesus…When our heavenly Father receives our worship, He receives it in the person of His Son and in the power of His Holy Spirit.[8]

C.   Evangelism

1.     Use in identifying cults

a)    Understanding = not necessary for salvation

(1)  OT saints did not know as much as we do.

b)    Acceptance = no guarantee

c)     But rejection = heresy

(1)  Always in other areas too
(2)  Why? Puts human intellect and experience above the plain meaning of Scripture.

2.     Use of analogies

a)    Egg

b)    Demon possession (#1)

c)     Father/son/husband = modalism

d)    Ice/water/steam ~ modalism

e)     Sun/beam/light

f)      Spirit/soul/body

g)    1 x 1 x 1 = 1 (?) (why 3 members of Trinity?)

h)    Books – C.S. Lewis (#4)

i)       Marriage/church/society (#4)

j)      An infinite God cannot be fully described by a finite illustration.  

3.     Use of proof texts

D.   Suffering

"One day,” he said,  "a woman came to me with her husband, and she told me, 'You are a father. You have children?'
"I said, yes. And she said, 'You are a father of your church also.'
"And I said okay.
"She said, 'I need your help.'
“I asked her what kind of help she needed. I thought maybe blankets or food.
“ 'I have three children, but the terrorists came in my home, and they killed all of them. What is this Allah?'
"She said ‘Allah,' because she is not Christian.
“ 'I will believe or I will not believe when I leave your office that there is a God. And you can help me. You have children. You can feel my feelings, what it would be like if you lose your children.'
I really prayed inside. “My Lord, what should I tell her?” And immediately, God gave me an idea.
“Okay, you don’t believe in Allah, that he is not a true god and if he is, how can they come and kill in the name of Allah? You lost your children, but you did not make this choice. I will introduce you to someone, he lost his son willingly.
“ 'What! Why he lost his Son willingly?'
"I started to tell her the story of God, the Father and Jesus, his Son and the Holy Spirit. She started to cry.
“ ‘You know what? You cannot understand me. Just God can understand my feelings because he lost his Son.” And she became a Christian in my office.

VIII.     Sing Trinitarian hymn


Be Thou Exalted
Be Thou exalted, forever and ever,
God of eternity, Ancient of Days!
Wondrous in majesty, perfect in wisdom,
Glorious in holiness, fearful in praise.

Refrain
Be Thou exalted by seraphs and angels,
Be Thou exalted with harp and with song;
Saints in their anthems of rapture adore Thee,
Thine be the glory forever, amen!
Be Thou exalted, O Son of the Highest! 
Gracious Redeemer, our Savior and King!
One with the Father, co-equal in glory,
Here at Thy footstool our homage we bring.

Refrain
Be Thou exalted, O Spirit eternal!
Dwell in our hearts, keep us holy within;
Feed us each day with Thy heavenly manna,
Healer of wounded hearts, Thy praises we sing.

Refrain

-- Fanny Crosby (alt by Alfred B. Smith)

Monday, February 14, 2011

Two ways to be wrong

Got this note from a friend.  (Which reminds me: if you come across something that you think my readers should read, please forward it to me!) 


His email needs no prefacing, other than to say that I find the attitude of this church just as misguided as that of Deepak.  Although Deepak and this church hold opposing theological views, the end result is still the same: the true good news of Jesus' life, death, and resurrection is not reaching people who need to hear it.
 
Daniel,
I ran into a couple of things that I thought you may be able to use in your blog.

The first is a short video clip of Deepak Chopra. You can google him if you don’t know much about him. It draws a comparison to his wisdom compared to the wisdom of Jesus. They tried to trick Jesus and ask him gotcha questions and get him caught up in his own words, but it never worked. When you read the gospels everything Jesus says is pretty much short, sweet, to the point and the best way it could be said. It is also the truth. He didn’t open himself up by saying idiotic things like Chopra says.


the second thing is a news story I came across about a mosque being opened up next to a church. I did not do any background checking into the history behind it but the reaction from the church, at least in this article is all wrong. If their was going to be a mosque built I my community I would encourage it to be built next to my church. I would be the first one to welcome them to the community and try to start a relationship with them. I would try to build on our shared belief in Christ and use it as an opportunity to steer them to the thru Lord. I would market to their members and invite them to learn more about “the prophet Jesus” who is in their Koran. I would see it as a wonderful opportunity to witness to Muslims.
But if you start out fighting them, you will probably never get that opportunity.
I am not lecturing you, I know you already know it, I just thought it would make for a good blog post.

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

No Collections: My All-time Favorite Hudson Taylor Story

My friends Chris and Janet Nevins' hearts have been captured by the Lord Jesus.  Chris is using his years of experience managing construction teams to assist missions agencies with construction tasks.  Visit their web site at www.fuelthemission.org to learn more.  Today I emailed them a bit of encouragement in the form of this true story from Hudson Taylor's life.  It tells the story of Hudson deliberately refusing to take an offering after speaking in a church.
   Preparations for sailing to China were at once proceeded with. About this time I was asked to give a lecture on China in a village not very far from London, and agreed to do so on condition that there should be no collection, and that this should be announced on the bills. The gentleman who invited me, and who kindly presided as chairman, said he had never had that condition imposed before. He accepted it, however, and the bills were issued accordingly for the 2nd or 3rd of May. With the aid of a large map, something of the extent and population and deep spiritual need of China was presented, and many were evidently impressed.
At the close of the meeting the chairman said that by my request it had been intimated on the bills that there would be no collection; but he felt that many present would be distressed and burdened if they had not the opportunity of contributing something towards the good work proposed. He trusted that as the proposition emanated entirely from himself, and expressed, he felt sure, the feelings of many in the audience, I should not object to it. I begged, however, that the condition agreed to might be carried out; pointing out among other reasons for making no collection, that the very reason adduced by our kind chairman was, to my mind, one of the strongest for not making it. My wish was, not that those present should be relieved by making such contribution as might there and then be convenient, under the influence of a present emotion; but that each one should go home burdened with the deep need of China, and ask of God what He would have them to do. If, after thought and prayer, they were satisfied that a pecuniary contribution was what He wanted of them, it could be given to any Missionary Society having agents in China; or it might be posted to our London office; but that perhaps in many cases what God wanted was not a money contribution, but personal consecration to His service abroad; or the giving up of son or daughter— more precious than silver or gold—to His service. I added that I thought the tendency of a collection was to leave the impression that the all-important thing was money, whereas no amount of money could convert a single soul; that what was needed was that men and women filled with the Holy Ghost should give themselves to the work: for the support of such there would never be a lack of funds. As my wish was evidently very strong, the chairman kindly yielded to it, and closed the meeting. He told me, however, at the supper-table, that he thought it was a mistake on my part, and that, notwithstanding all I had said, a few persons had put some little contributions into his hands.
   Next morning at breakfast, my kind host came in a little late, and acknowledged to not having had a very good night. After breakfast he asked me to his study, and giving me the contributions handed to him the night before, said, "I thought last night, Mr. Taylor, that you were in the wrong about a collection; I am now convinced you were quite right. As I thought in the night of that stream of souls in China ever passing onward into the dark, I could only cry as you suggested, 'Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do?' I think I have obtained the guidance I sought, and here it is." He handed me a cheque for L500, adding that if there had been a collection he would have given a few pounds to it, but now this cheque was the result of having spent no small part of the night in prayer.
I need scarcely say how surprised and thankful I was for this gift. I had received at the breakfast-table a letter from Messrs. Killick, Martin and Co., shipping agents, in which they stated that they could offer us the whole passenger accommodation of the ship Lammermuir. I went direct to the ship, found it in every way suitable, and paid the cheque on account. As above stated, the funds deemed needed had been already in hand for some time; but the coincidence of the simultaneous offer of the ship accommodation and this munificent gift—God's " exceeding abundantly "— greatly encouraged my heart.

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Mom's Spine Fractures Again

As you know if you have been reading my blog for a while, in mid-2009, my mother suffered some osteoporosis-induced compression fractures to her spine.  Besides the tremendous pain of the fractured bones, this also caused severe (and painful) constipation.  In the last year and a half she has gradually recovered from that.  Her fractures healed and she learned ways to keep her bowels moving, albeit imperfectly. 

She has even been able to go to church regularly the last two months, something she had not done in over 12 years.  As recently as last week she was working to rebuild her stamina in walking, going about half a mile with the help of a walker.

This week those improvements evaporated as another compression fracture struck her spine.  This one seems to be in a worse location than the previous ones, because now sometimes even using her arms will throw her back into an excruciating spasm. The constipation too has returned with vigor.

Although her immediate situation is far from pleasant, perhaps the biggest battle right now is with the fears of what tomorrow may bring.  Barring a miracle, her osteoporosis won't improve. There are a lot of "what will we do if...?" issues, made more complex by her pre-existing environmental allergies.

Mom's attitude is remarkably strong, far more level-headed than I would be if I were in her shoes. 

We would be grateful if you will pray for her.  Here are three passages of Scripture you can pray over Mom (and all 3 of us):

And even when I am old and gray, O God, do not forsake me, Until I declare Your strength to this generation, Your power to all who are to come. (Psalm 71:18 NASB -- all of this chapter is good!)

Therefore we do not lose heart, but though our outer man is decaying, yet our inner man is being renewed day by day. For momentary, light affliction is producing for us an eternal weight of glory far beyond all comparison, while we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen; for the things which are seen are temporal, but the things which are not seen are eternal. (2 Cor. 4:16-18, NASB)

Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God. Consider him who endured from sinners such hostility against himself, so that you may not grow weary or fainthearted. In your struggle against sin you have not yet resisted to the point of shedding your blood. And have you forgotten the exhortation that addresses you as sons? "My son, do not regard lightly the discipline of the Lord, nor be weary when reproved by him. For the Lord disciplines the one he loves, and chastises every son whom he receives." (Heb 12:1-6, ESV)

I will close with a friend's recent Facebook message that encouraged me:

God is good; therefore, life is hard.

Amen.

Thursday, January 13, 2011

The Chevrolet that wanted to be a Cadillac

From the free email newsletter eFaxofLife (sign up at www.efaxoflife.com) -- Daniel

We are greatly impacted by the friends we have and the books we read. Please consider Richard Woike (president of a major insurance company and past president of CBMC-International) a friend and author as you read what he shared at a CBMC convention in Arizona.

The Chevrolet That Wanted to Be A Cadillac

(An Allegory)

When a business man gets up in front of a bunch of men like this (I understand there are almost 800 men here) and opens his Bible, some folks say, "Why doesn't he act like a business man instead of a Preacher?" I want to assure you right away that I am not going to preach a sermon. I enjoy reading my Bible. As a matter of fact, by the simple method of reading three or four pages a day, I have made a habit of reading it through once a year for the past sixteen years, and I go about recommending to other business men that this is the best investment of time I know of.

But, I have discovered that in this era of television, people don't use their minds the way they should. In the old days, when we read books, we used to visualize what we read. Now "they" do the visualizing for us. Just for a few minutes, then, I'd like to take a very familiar verse out of the Bible an ask you to do some pleasant mental exercise with me. Perhaps you'd like to close your eyes so that you can see the picture a little more clearly. I know that some of you do this on Sunday morning when the minister is preaching, and I'm sure that if he notices, he understands that you are just visualizing what he is saying.

I have a good precedent for what I am about to do, for many years ago another peddler by the name of John Bunyan wrote a book called, "Pilgrim's Progress," which is simply an allegory about the life of a Christian. I am going to borrow Bunyan's technique and give you an allegory to illustrate this Bible verse: "If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold all things are become new" (2 Corinthians 5:17).

My story concerns an old Chevrolet. How old? Well, if you must be exact, it was a 1926 Chevy. It had running boards, and no trunk, and the spare tire was strapped on in back, and the windshield went straight up and down. It was a good solid car, mind you, made of steel - and far enough off the ground so that you could see where you were going, and it had lots of character. Its owner was proud of the fact that he had bought it new and kept it in what he called "good condition" for more than twenty-five years, and he was perfectly satisfied with his car.

One day as he was driving down one of the main streets of his town, this man was stopped by a parade. It was around Election Day, and he soon saw that it was a political parade. There was a lot of excitement, and bands, and flags. But, most interesting of all, there was an important personage being escorted to the Armory. And who should it turn out to be but the President of the United States!

The owner little realized the effect that this parade had had on his faithful Chevy until they reached home. Just as he was about to turn off the ignition, the Chevrolet said something that startled the man out of a year's growth. (Let me stop here to say to you unimaginative folk that every car has a real personality. The trouble nowadays is that people don't drive their cars long enough to learn the language of an automobile. In the old days a car was a close friend, to which you often spoke, and which surely could talk back).

"Just a minute, please," said the Chevy. "I've been thinking a lot ever since we watched that parade this afternoon. And I've decided something very important. I don't want to be an old Chevrolet any more. I want to be a brand new Cadillac."

"A brand new Cadillac?" gasped the owner. "Why, what in the world's come over you?" "I don't know, exactly," answered the Chevy. "All I know is that when I saw that bright, shiny, new Cadillac carrying the President of the United States right up Main Street, where everybody could see him, I just got an uncontrollable urge to be a new Cadillac, so that I can carry the President around for people to see."

Whether the owner got the full import of this statement is not certain. He did a perfectly natural thing. He thought, "This old pile must be overheated." So, without saying another word he turned the ignition key and dashed into the house, hoping that good night's sleep would straighten out the whole matter.

Right here I can almost hear some of you thinking, "Now what kind of nonsense is this? Here I am, invited out to hear a business man from New York address a business men's convention in Phoenix, Arizona, and he spins a silly yarn about a 1926 Chevy that wants to be a brand new Cadillac."

Before you judge me too harshly, my friend let me remind you that I started out by asking you to visualize a verse from the Bible that we take too much for granted. It talks about what a Christian really is. It says that if any man is a Christian, he has become a brand new creation...Since it's awfully hard to think about men without getting personal, I'm simply asking you to imagine we're all automobiles. Some of you are Packard's, and some of you are 1923 Stutz Bearcats, and some of you look like Stanley Steamers. And the problem we're discussing is how these old wrecks can be made over into brand new models.

Because, you see, too many of us haven't caught the vision that the old Chevy did. He wanted to be seen carrying the President of the United States around. No man ever becomes a Christian unless he senses the desire which God alone can plant in his hears; the desire to be the vehicle in which Christ Himself can be seen. If you've never had this urge, you call all this "foolishness," and you're right. The Bible says that " the natural man receives not the things of the Spirit, for they are foolishness to him."

Well, back to our allegory.

The next morning the owner found, to his dismay that the old Chevy had not gotten over his strange ambition. On the contrary, things seemed to have crystallized in his thinking. For he knew just what he wanted. And he stated his wants to no uncertain terms. "I want," said he, "to be a new Cadillac, and I've decided what you and I have to do. You have to take me down to the garage. They have a new finishing process down there that they use on all the Cadillac's in town that gives them a shine like nobody's business. I want to shine like a Cadillac. Then, I've decided I smell too much of alcohol. I want you to have me drained and flushed out and filled up with Prestone, so I won't smell of alcohol any more. Who ever heard of a Cadillac smelling of alcohol? Then I want a ring job that'll get rid of my bad habit of smoking. You look at the next Cadillac you see. Do you ever notice smoke coming out of a Cadillac exhaust? Of course not. They just don't smoke. And I want to be a Cadillac. I don't want to smoke."

The owner, fond as he was of his old car, at first balked at this unprecedented order. But, after fighting a losing battle for days, he finally gave in and had all three jobs done at the local garage. For a little while this seemed to satisfy the Chevy. "Look at me," he crowed, the first day. "Boy, do I shine like a Cadillac! I look clean, I feel clean, I don't smell of alcohol, and I don't smoke. I'm sure everybody must think I'm a new Cadillac." But all the time in his heart, he knew that he wasn't anything but an old Chevy which was trying to fool the public and not succeeding too well. So, after a short interval of exhilaration there came a depression which was almost too heavy for his springs to bear.

Some of you men know exactly how he felt. It's a funny thing how Christians succeed in confusing this issue of being a brand-new creation. We urge folks to turn over a new leaf, and polish up the outside of their lives. We even try to make Christians out of people by selling them on the idea that if they stop smelling like alcohol, or stop smoking, that this will enable them to be Christians. Of course this method doesn't work for men any more than it does for automobiles.

One day a new idea suddenly occurred to the Chevy. Downtown, his owner had been using a parking lot that charged fifty cents a day. Right across the street there was a seventy-five-cents-a-day parking lot. Naturally, there were many more Cadillac's in the latter.

"Let's go to the Cadillac parking lot," he suggested rather firmly, that morning. And, though his thrifty master balked at the added cost, that's where they went for the next few weeks. It seemed to work, too. Just being among so many Cadillac's seemed to make the Chevy feel like a Cadillac. "This Cadillac environment is just what I need," he confided happily to his owner one evening. "Why, those Caddies just accept me as if I were one of them."

But this beautiful dream came crashing into the dust one day when the Chevy heard a child cry out, shrilly, "Look at the old Chevy parked right in there with all those nice Cadillac's." So mortified was he that from then on he wanted no part of the new parking lot.

This did not prevent him, however, from perpetrating an even greater piece of strategy a short time later. It was December, and he overheard the owner mention that he would be getting new plates the next day. "New plates?" he asked. "That means you'll be filling out registration papers, doesn't it?"

"Why, yes," answered the puzzled owner. "What do you have in mind?"

"Well," came the unexpected reply, "suppose that this time when you fill in the papers, where it asks for a description of me, say that I'm a brand new Cadillac."

"How can I do that?" cried the distressed owner. "That would be perjury."

"Who's ever going to find out?" asked the Chevy. "It'll make me feel better to know that if anything ever happens to me, at least I've been registered as a Cadillac."

So nothing would do but that the unhappy owner, feeling as guilty as a check forger, filled out the registration blank for the 1926 Chevrolet by inserting a description of the car as a new Cadillac. Fortunately, no detective trailed him, and he and the car were the only ones who ever knew that the state's rolls had been padded by one non-existent Caddie.

Of course you're having no trouble in following our little allegory. You've seen folks who associate with Christians on the theory that you can become a Christian by association. You've even seen some folks get their names on a church roll by committing a slight error in providing information to the human beings who keep the registration records. They fool the people (sometimes), and they try to fool themselves, but you and they both know that they can't fool God.

Our Chevy, naturally, didn't profit by his deception, and one day as he was parked in another part of town, he noticed a female car nearby who was obviously concerned about him. He knew she was a she because she had her name right on her hubcap - Mercedes.

"What's the matter, little one?" she inquired, tenderly. "You look just miserable. Can I help? Just tell me all your troubles, because I love to listen to the troubles of others."

With such an invitation, it didn't take the Chevy long to unburden himself.


Look," he said. "My trouble is simply this. I'm a 1926 Chevrolet, and I want to be a brand new Cadillac, because I want to be able to carry the President of the United States around in me. Obviously he can't ride in me the way I am. I've tried everything I can think of, and still I know I'm not any nearer to being what I want to be than when I first started."

"Splendid, splendid!" gushed Mercedes. "You came to the right place for guidance, because that is exactly the kind of a situation I can help you with. You need to think right thoughts. As a matter of fact, since you want to be a Cadillac, you must think Cadillac thoughts. From now on repeat slowly, every time you find a Chevrolet thought crowding into your radiator, these words: "Every day, every moment, every second, I am becoming more and more like a brand new Cadillac. And after awhile, you'll be one!"

It seemed so easy, and so tangible, that for at least two weeks the little Chevy tried it religiously, even though most of the time the rattles of his rusty body and the squeaks of his well-worn springs seemed to drown out his aspirations of Cadillac-hood.

Finally, he came to himself, and realized that all the wishing and all the protestations of being something he wasn't were doing absolutely nothing about changing his real condition. One night he though the whole thing through and reached a great decision.

He greeted his owner the next morning with a firm declaration. ""I have decided," he said, "that I want to be a brand new Cadillac, but that I've been going at it the wrong way. I want you to take me down to 1775 Broadway at the corner of 57th Street, and I want to go right to the Head Man of General Motors. After all, he makes all the Chevies and all the Cadillac's in the world, and if there's anybody who can help me, he can."

By this time the owner knew there was no use in arguing, but he did weakly mention that the Head Man was probably too busy even to think about a 1926 Chevy. His protest being ignored, they soon found themselves wheeling down Broadway, past Columbus Circle, and right up to the Main Entrance of the General Motors Building. As they approached, the owner was glad that he hadn't pressed his point too much, because he was approaching them as they ground to a halt at the curb one whom he recognized as Harlow Curtice, the Head Man of General Motors Corporation. There was a smile of welcome on his face, as if he had been expecting them. "What can I do for you?" he asked.

"Now, wait a minute," I can hear some of you hard-headed business men exclaim, "you're letting this allegory of yours run away with your imagination. After all, you don't expect the President of a big company like General Motors to be waiting at the curb to welcome every customer that comes along."

In this particular case, believe it or not, my allegory is borrowing its facts from the Biblical account of the Prodigal Son, which assures us that when the son came to himself, and started back home, thinking up all sorts of speeches to try to win his father over, he was amazed to see his father, while he was still a long way off, coming to meet him. No, sir, I can't exaggerate the fact that the Head Man is personally and vitally interested in every old Chevrolet that wants to be a new Cadillac.

So the 1926 Chevy had his invitation to tell all that was on his heart, and he took full advantage of it. Hardly had he finished telling Mr. Curtice his desire to become a brand new Cadillac than he rejoiced to hear the words, "Why, yes. We'll be glad to do that for you."

With that the Head Man asked the owner to step out, and put one of his own men behind the wheel. "Now," thought the Chevy, "comes the exciting part. They'll probably ship me out to Detroit and fix up all my squeaks and rattles and enlarge my body and gold-plate parts of me, till I hardly recognize myself."

But he was wrong. Instead, the new driver took him through the Holland Tunnel and up a Steep hill, till he saw the name of the place - Hoboken. He drove him into a yard with a sign on it, "JUNK."

Next thing he knew, they took off his wheels, removed his interior, smashed his glass, and then suddenly, when he least expected it, dropped a five-ton weight right on his top...BLOTZO!

When he woke up, he knew, somehow, that he was different. Different? Yes, excitingly different. Suddenly, his owner came out to the garage. "Well," he asked, "and how does it feel to be a brand new Cadillac?" He sat down in the driver's seat, turned the ignition, and suddenly there came the sound of 300 horse-power purring in beautiful coordination. He backed out of the garage, and silently they rode down to the center of town - ready, willing, and able to pick up the President of the United States and to display him to all who would look.

This ends my allegory. I can't explain to you what Harlow Curtice did to turn that disreputable, worthless old 1926 Chevrolet for a brand new Cadillac. It took Harlow Curtice himself to do it, I guess, and then only because he's the Head Man, and he has the power to do miracles like that. Didn't it cost anything to make this change? Well, it didn't cost the Chevy and his owner anything, but you may be sure that under General Motor's meticulous Cost Control it had to be charged to somebody's account. In this case it was charged to the Head Man himself, Harlow Curtice.

In your case and mine, it costs nothing to be made over into a brand new creation, but it cost God a great deal. His Word tells us that He so loved us that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on Him should not perish, but have everlasting life. Jesus Christ paid the price for your transformation.

The thing that the Chevy couldn't understand was that he was completely scrapped before he became a brand new Cadillac. Like us, he thought that they were going to use him as a base, and sort of do him over. And unfortunately, there are a great many people today trying awfully hard to trim off a bit here and add a little there in order to prove to themselves, and the Lord, and the world that they are becoming Christians. Paul had it exactly right when he said, "I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me." (Galatians 2:20).

"IF ANY MAN BE IN CHRIST, HE IS A NEW CREATURE:
OLD THINGS ARE PASSED AWAY;
BEHOLD, ALL THINGS ARE BECOME NEW."